Home
Adventures of a Geek - Oracle on Linux Considered Harmful to Health

> Recent Entries
> Archive
> Friends
> User Info
> My Website

Advertisement

September 29th, 2006


Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
10:07 am - Oracle on Linux Considered Harmful to Health

For the past week, excluding Tuesday when I was in Harrogate, I've been transferring my development environment over to my own personal laptop. I started off with WebSphere Studio, as I already had the installation media. It's aimed at Red Hat 7.2 or 8.0, or SuSE 7.2 or 8.1 (of course), but it installed perfectly in a 32-bit chroot on my Ubuntu Dapper AMD64 Operating System.

So then I moved onto Oracle. Not just any old version of Oracle. Our production platform is running 9.2.0.1 with patches, so I wanted to get as close to that as I possibly could, which turned out to be 9.2.0.4. It has a 64-bit version available, so I downloaded all 1.5GB of installation media and burned it to DVD. I was sent a script by our support guy who'd installed the same version on our DR kit. It was a bash script that checked your system to make sure it would be happy with Oracle. Apart from a couple of tools (gawk, env) not being where expected (solved with a couple of symlinks) and some kernel parameters that needed to be tuned, the only thing it found wrong was that Ubuntu Dapper wasn't a certified platform for Oracle 9.2.0. Well there's a surprise, considering Oracle 9.2.0.4 pre-dates Ubuntu by a couple of years.

Anyway, satisfied that all would be hunky-dory, I set up the user anf groups and proceeded to run the installer anyway. I entered the required information about what I was installing (Database), what type of installation (Enterprise), what type of database (None) and left it to go. It hung up at 17% saying:

Installing Oracle Required Support Files 32 bit 9.2.0.1.0
Link Pending...


Copying naeet.o

I left it for a while, but no change. I checked the log file, which appeared to be written in some ancient dialect of OracleDeveloperBollocks and wasn't much use. So I cancelled the installation, cleaned up and Googled. And Googled. And Googled. Don't get me wrong, there's a wealth of information out there, just none of it useful. The most hopeful article I managed to find involved installing Oracle 10g Express from the Oracle Debian repository – which would surely be a less troublesome route to take, but it's the wrong version of Oracle. Alas, after a week of gnashing of teeth, symlinks, banging my head against the wall, installing old compatibility libraries, I think I'm just going to have to settle for it.


Current Location: Cavendish, Derby, UK
Current Mood: [mood icon] discontent
Tags: , ,

(Leave a comment)

Comments:


From:(Anonymous)
Date:March 9th, 2007 11:24 am (UTC)

Save my soul from Oracle 9i

(Link)
Hi!

Just got the task of installing Oracle 9i on Linux (X86_64 CentOS if it matters) and I'm experiencing just the exact same problem.

If anyone knows the solution, PLS tell me here, or drop me a mail at tmp@wbpmu.hu!

Thx!
From:(Anonymous)
Date:April 12th, 2007 12:20 pm (UTC)

possible solution

(Link)
Don't know if this works for you ubuntu users as well.. i just installed Oracle 9.2.0.4 64 bit on my SuSE 10.0. I got it to work after setting LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.10 . You might find some infos concerning this on the net, where they tell yuo to set it to 2.2.something. Dont bother this wont work.
From:(Anonymous)
Date:November 22nd, 2007 01:46 pm (UTC)

This is just the beginnning of the hell

(Link)
Hi

I tried to install Oracle 9.2.0.4 64bits on linux. I made it,
but it was the hell on earth to me. First of all, I tried RH, FC
and Suse. I have succeeded on Suse 9.3. But the distribution is
not only the requisite. the problem with the naeet.o was just the
first big mysterious problem I have encountered. I don't remember
all the black magic I have to do, but I took some notes on it. If
you are still interested I can search it and send to you, or post
here. But I remember that I had to switch to command line many
times, change manually things like the version of gcc and calling
make on specific sub-directories and switch back to the installation
window...

Luis Otavio de Colla Furquim
luisfurquim at gmail dot com
From:(Anonymous)
Date:September 15th, 2008 09:19 am (UTC)

Re: This is just the beginnning of the hell

(Link)
hi, please post here how have u solved a problem with naeet.o

> Go to Top
LiveJournal.com